Feature #513

idea for relative AF_UNIX sockets

Added by Anonymous 1028 days ago. Updated 55 days ago.

Status:Wontfix Start:
Priority:Normal Due date:
Assigned to:- % Done:

0%
Category:core
Target version:-
Pending:

No

 Resolution:

wontfix
Patch available:

Description

Issue #394 closes off the possibility of specifying an AF_UNIX socket as a relative path. But why can't a server.bind that starts with a dot also be interpreted as an AF_UNIX socket? Do AF_INET/AF_INET6 addresses ever start with a dot?

I would appreciate it if you considered this option.

-- chad

History

09/02/2008 01:07 PM - stbuehler

  • Status changed from New to Fixed
  • Resolution set to wontfix

Just use


server.bind = var.cwd + "/lighttpd.sock"

10/10/2008 07:04 PM - stbuehler

  • Status changed from Fixed to Wontfix

Also available in: Atom PDF